Banking Exams

AFO Cut Off: Comparing the Last 2 Years for Agricultural Field Officer (Scale I)

Every aspirant preparing for the Agricultural Field Officer (Scale I) exam eventually asks the same question: what score is actually "safe"? Looking at the last two years of cut-off data helps answer that, but there's an important catch for anyone preparing for the current cycle the exam pattern itself has changed, so older cut-off numbers can't be read as direct score targets. This guide compares the last two years of AFO cut-off trends and explains exactly how to use that data given the revised pattern.

What the AFO Cut Off Actually Means

AFO releases cut-off marks separately for Prelims, Mains, and the final selection stage, and each serves a different purpose:

  • Prelims cut-off: The minimum score needed in each section, and overall, just to be shortlisted for Mains. These marks are then discarded entirely.

  • Mains cut-off: Based specifically on the Professional Knowledge score, since that is the only component used for merit.

  • Final cut-off: The combined, normalised score from Mains and Interview (in an 80:20 ratio) needed to secure a seat within the available vacancies.

Cut-offs are decided every cycle based on the number of vacancies, the difficulty of that year's paper, and how many candidates cleared each stage they are never fixed numbers set in advance.

Why Direct Comparison to the Current Cycle Isn't Straightforward

This is the most important thing to understand before using any historical cut-off table. The AFO exam pattern was revised for the current cycle: Prelims moved from a three-section, 125-mark paper to a four-section paper of the same total marks but with a newly added Professional Knowledge section, and Mains expanded from a 60-mark, Professional-Knowledge-only paper to a 225-mark paper across five components including a Descriptive test.

This means previous years' cut-off marks were calculated on a completely different question and marks structure. A Prelims cut-off of 66 out of 125 in an older, three-section paper is not directly comparable to a score out of 125 in the current four-section paper, since the sections, marks-per-question, and difficulty balance are different. Historical data is still useful but as a signal of competition level and trend direction, not as a literal target score to aim for this cycle.

AFO Prelims Sectional Cut Off: 2024 vs 2025

The table below shows the sectional cut-off marks from the two most recent completed cycles, based on the previous three-section Prelims structure (English Language, Reasoning, and General Awareness/Quantitative Aptitude).

Section

Max Marks

2024 (SC/ST/OBC/PwBD)

2024 (EWS/General)

2025 (SC/ST/OBC/PwBD)

2025 (EWS/General)

English Language

25

5.00

7.75

7.75

10.50

Reasoning

50

1.00

4.25

4.25

8.25

General Awareness / Quantitative Aptitude

50

3.00

6.25

7.25

11.25

Every section's cut-off rose from 2024 to 2025, which points to either an easier paper, a larger or stronger applicant pool, or both. Since the current cycle introduces a fourth section (Professional Knowledge) with double marks per question, sectional cut-offs for this cycle will be structured differently and should be checked directly against the official result once released.

AFO Prelims Overall Cut Off: Category-Wise

Based on the most recently completed cycle, the overall Prelims cut-off (out of 125, under the previous pattern) was reported as follows:

Category

Overall Prelims Cut-Off

General

66.25

EWS

61.50

OBC

63.75

SC

57.00

ST

50.25

The gap between the General and ST cut-off (roughly 16 marks) reflects the standard reservation-driven spread seen across most IBPS exams, rather than anything specific to this recruitment. This gap tends to remain fairly consistent in proportion, even as the absolute cut-off numbers shift with each cycle's difficulty level.

AFO Mains and Final Cut Off Trend

Since Mains merit is based entirely on the Professional Knowledge score, its cut-off is a more direct reflection of how well candidates handled agriculture-specific questions that year. Combined with the Interview score, the final cut-off (out of a normalised 100) showed a clear upward trend across the two most recent completed cycles, with the General/UR final minimum rising from roughly 62 to about 70. This kind of year-on-year increase generally signals growing competition more applicants, stronger overall preparation, or fewer vacancies relative to demand rather than a single-year anomaly.

What the Two-Year Trend Tells Us

Reading these numbers together, a few patterns stand out:

  • Competition has been rising, not falling. Both the Prelims sectional cut-offs and the final cut-off moved upward from 2024 to 2025, suggesting the safer strategy is to prepare for a tougher benchmark than last year's numbers rather than an easier one.

  • Category-wise gaps stay roughly proportional. Even as absolute numbers shift, the relative distance between General, OBC, SC, and ST cut-offs has remained fairly stable, which is useful for gauging your own target range based on your category.

  • Professional Knowledge performance drives the final outcome. Since Mains merit depends solely on this section, and the final cut-off has been climbing, treating Professional Knowledge preparation as the single highest-leverage area of study is justified by the data, not just general advice.

How to Use These Cut Off Trends in Your Preparation

  • Treat old cut-offs as a competition indicator, not a score target. With the pattern changed, aim to comfortably clear each section rather than calculating a precise "safe score" based on last year's numbers.

  • Prepare for a rising benchmark. Given the two-year upward trend, targeting a score meaningfully above the most recent cut-off is a safer approach than aiming to just clear it.

  • Watch the official result release closely this cycle. Since this is the first cycle under the revised pattern, the newly published cut-off will effectively become the new reference point for future years it's worth reviewing carefully once released on ibps.in.

  • Prioritise Professional Knowledge accuracy over sheer attempt count. Since Mains merit is driven entirely by this section, and its cut-off has trended upward, consistent accuracy here matters more than a high but error-prone attempt rate.

Practising with pattern-accurate mock tests on Testkart, alongside subject-wise Professional Knowledge quizzes, can help you benchmark your current preparation against a rising, rather than static, target.

Factors That Influence the AFO Cut Off Every Year

  • Number of vacancies: Fewer vacancies relative to applicants generally pushes the cut-off higher.

  • Paper difficulty: An easier paper typically produces a higher cut-off, since more candidates score well.

  • Applicant pool strength: A larger or better-prepared pool of agriculture graduates in a given year raises the competitive bar.

  • Normalisation across shifts: Since the exam may be conducted in multiple shifts, IBPS adjusts scores using an equi-percentile method, which can cause minor cut-off variations between shifts.

For Educators

Coaching institutes and independent educators can use Testkart to share cut-off trend analysis alongside subject-wise practice tests, helping students calibrate realistic target scores each cycle rather than anchoring on a single year's numbers that may not reflect the current pattern.

Frequently Asked Questions

Ready to practice? Explore Agricultural Field Officer - Scale I mock tests from top educators.

Browse Agricultural Field Officer - Scale I Mock Tests