PUTHAT 2026: Cut-off Guide
PUTHAT cut-off information is useful only when it identifies the programme, category, selection stage and source year. The 2026 prospectus requires at least 15% of the test maximum for inclusion in the merit list, reduced to 10% for SC/ST/BC/PwD candidates. With a 100-mark paper, these thresholds correspond to 15 and 10 marks. They do not guarantee a seat.
This page uses the verified 2026 official position and explains how to read a benchmark. It does not publish a predicted admission cut-off or present an unverified score as last year’s closing mark. Your personal practice target should be ambitious enough to guide preparation, but it remains a study decision rather than an official admission promise.
PUTHAT cut-off: what is officially supported
The rule reference is the PUTHAT official 2026 information. These are labelled 2026 rules, checked while drafting on 13 November 2026. Do not assume an unverified later-cycle schedule or rule is unchanged.
2026 merit-list threshold | Percentage of paper maximum | Equivalent on 100 marks |
|---|---|---|
General requirement | 15% | 15 marks |
SC/ST/BC/PwD | 10% | 10 marks |
These are minimum requirements for inclusion in the relevant merit list under the prospectus. Actual admission also depends on merit position, available seats, category, course choice and the university’s admission process. Do not label 15 or 10 marks as the closing score of a particular BHMCT or BTTM seat.
How to verify an admission benchmark
Start with the official record: use the university, institution or CET admission source for the correct cycle.
Identify the precise row: match programme, category, seat type and selection round before recording the number.
Record the measure: write marks, percentile, rank or merit number exactly as the document defines it.
Preserve the source: save the URL, document title and source year beside the figure so you can recheck it.
Why benchmarks change
Admission outcomes depend on the number of seats, applicant choices, performance and the rules used for that intake. Paper difficulty can change raw scores without producing an identical change in merit position. A later round can also reflect applicants accepting, declining or changing choices. A previous closing figure should therefore describe history rather than forecast a guaranteed result.
Set a useful practice target
First stabilise accuracy on questions you know how to solve. Then track performance across several unseen full papers with comparable structure. If a section repeatedly loses marks through rushed reading or arithmetic, improve that process before chasing a higher attempt count. Keep your own target separate from the official benchmark column.
The PUTHAT exam pattern guide helps you attach the correct duration and scoring rule to a practice score. This is especially important when an exam changes structure or when a mock uses a deduction that differs from the official instructions.
Use the PUTHAT mock-test guide to organise repeated measurement. When comparing available tests on Testkart, examine the structure and explanations; Testkart practice results should be used to plan revision, not to claim a guaranteed admission chance.
Keep a score log that supports decisions
Entry | What to record |
|---|---|
Practice context | Date, paper route, source cycle and whether questions were unseen |
Performance | Correct, wrong, unanswered and time used |
Error cause | Knowledge gap, misreading, calculation, transfer or navigation |
Next action | One specific repair task and a later recheck |
Update the log after checking explanations, then return to the weak idea in a changed question. This turns a cut-off search into a preparation decision while preserving the distinction between personal evidence and an official admission result.
Frequently Asked Questions
Ready to practice? Explore PUTHAT mock tests from top educators.
Browse PUTHAT Mock Tests